The spicier meat, with a side of bacon wrapped scallops and ice cold water. This is where I talk and draw about the Freaky (loli shota cub). Sometimes I also talk about general sex topics.
Most posts unlisted except retoots. Follow requests accepted and vetted. No DNI, FUB free. I like to talk so check replies.
I haven't designed this boy I have alluded to yet, but I am thinking of him existing in some kind of apocalyptic post-society beyond anarchy world where basically everyone fends for themselves. He is adept at survival: knows a lot of outdoor skills, how to craft items with low materials, what is safe to eat and drink, etc. He is also cripplingly shy, especially around other humans.
This world is inhabited by humans, domestic animals, and mutated wild animals and monsters (potentially also very "evolved" animals, like maybe stuff you would see in The Future Is Wild). Many large cities and towns up to this point have crumbled and decayed heavily. No buildings are more than a couple stories high, and the insides are overgrown with plant life. I am not too concerned about the cause of this apocalypse at this point in time. It would have been millenia ago. And civilization hasn't really sprung up again since, not as organized as it was before.
But anyway, I want to pair this boy with one of these mutated monsters (I do have an adopt in mind for it...). Already bizarre looking, it can also shapeshift to an extent, which helps it survive. Like the boy it tends to keep to itself, seemingly having trust issues. They do gravitate towards each other. Perhaps they both have a sense of loneliness that is alleviated being around each other.
I am just so tired n exhausted. I get side-eyed by people who don't like kemo/lolisho/noncon and then I can't relate with a lot of other people who do. I'm a foreigner everywhere I go
@ibly it's been banned since the beginning. It's just become more public because of other TOS changes/they supposedly "took feedback" from the community
Look I don't want to diss anyone or imply people can't have preferences or should just be 100% open and tolerant to everything but, it is just baffling to me when you have these kink artists who draw all sorts of weird and out there stuff and obviously pride themselves in how "freaky" they are, but then underage is crossing the line. And ppl are so passive aggressive about it too.
Like "I'll draw toxic yaoi boys crying and stabbing each other BUT THEY MUST BE 18 YEARS OF AGE..." I don't even see lolishota as strange as like inflation or I don't know mammal paws on car gas pedals but it is suuuch a sticking point for others.
And again I am not saying people can't have their tastes. I don't like scat or smegma and I think STDs are the least sexy thing on the planet. While also adoring shota guro where the boy is almost unrecognizable. But you wouldn't catch me throwing shade around at people who do like those things above. I notice this tone of dismissiveness kink artists have about underage and it's disconcerting, especially with all this censorship nonsense happening this year
@bakersteak relevant here too: does me portraying consensual loli-shota mean that I think adults and kids should have sexual relationships? If I draw loli being raped, does that mean I think that it's ok for this to happen to kids? And various other tropes. Just doesn't work.
@hearthunter re: that post, those people are probably not actually forming philosophy at all and are just going with what's popular. ethics of cops and laws and when to follow them is a layered and heavy topic that one needs time to think about beyond some twitter thread
@hearthunter@ebi@prettydrilby there ia literally no way for other people to know if those women were actually exploited from a second hand story... The Assumption Game is crazy
That's it man, I am just gonna have to figure something out myself... Can't find anything even similar to what I am looking for. Nobody sells human child adopts they are ALL kemonomimi and that's not what I want at this moment
@hearthunter@ebi yeah i don't think everything needs to be "accurate to real life" anyway. Most fiction is not going for that kind of realism so i don't know why some fans insist on it so hard... I could think of reasons though
just a warning for getting kind of dark (possible internalized misogyny?)Ok I thought of a "reason" for Mom to do this. She doesn't want her daughter to have these things done to her by a stranger. Maybe they live in a setting where rates of sexual assault/murder are very high for young girls, and Mom is convinced it would happen to her daughter no matter what. Like, the daughter is too outgoing, or too curious, maybe just she likes wearing "provocative" clothes. So Mom is going to spare her the pain of being raped and killed by a stranger and... Do it herself so that her daughter stays in familiar hands. It's a very insane conclusion to reach
just a warning for getting kind of darkThis is probably a very specific combination of things but I would like to see a story about a mother raping and killing her daughter (of her own voalition, so not inebriated/blackmail/mind control) mainly because it would be interesting seeing mom's logic and reasoning for doing so. The mental gymnasium for this has to be wild...
@ebi@hearthunter i noticed this obsession in eng fandom with representation that is very Direct and Immediately Visible. Like there were ppl on tumblr in Fire Emblem fandom who drew "white" characters with "black" skin (i use quotes b/c these games take place in fictional worlds) and those artists would get very upset when asked why they do this. I guess it's cause they are black and want to have more black characters but admittedly it's a little weird to me they have to change this thing to be able to relate to the characters? i'm not really a "put myself into the fiction" kind of person anyway
us pol@puppy thanks for your responses puppy, I appreciate it. I too am human, so I do think it's normal and justified to feel relief at such a thing, and wish for an end...
When I compare what we've both said, I think my desire is a balance of logic and emotion for the situation (this is how I tend to think of things). I've seen the consequences of similar events through history, and can already see issues springing up with this (people being silenced on blusky, blame for the shooting being shifted to the people he oppressed). In a sense, I am worried that our immediate reaction might bring unwanted attention? If that makes sense?
Admittedly there are probably other factors that lead to my outburst, though it is something I believe strongly, this year has really been piling on.
Because I keep having to see it, on even this instance, I'm not going to be subtle here. I'm done seeing it and I'm done being silent and vague about it.
You are celebrating the death of a person. Yes, Kirk was a bad person. Yes, his actions hurt and killed other people. Yes, he derserved consequences for his actions. That is not up for debate. If you feel relief over this, then fine.
But I am not going to keep pretending that this growing trend of supposedly progressive, "good" people wishing the deaths of all the people who stand against them is fine, because the people they want dead are bad.
If you believe that the world would be a better place if all the bad people were murdered, you are taking on the same logic as antishippers, fascists, Nazis, etc. I don't know how people can't see this, especially those victimized by these groups. You are saying the same things, and that doesn't change because of who the target is.
You cannot be an advocate for human rights and believe that people deserve to die. You cannot be an advocate for human rights and believe they are conditional. This is how they get taken away from us.
Let's think for a second what actually happens when figureheads like this die, assassinated. Do their supporters just stop if the person is dead? Do they back down and hide? No, they get bolder, they get louder, they find more solidarity. What was accomplished?
Human society cannot function if we have people deciding who gets to have human rights. This goes for everyone. Nobody should get to choose. They are supposed to be inalienable. When we do that, we are proving that we are no better than wild animals in a kill or be killed world. It's baffling and disgusting to me as someone who has to face discrimination and othering that those who purport to be better think like this.
Been very in the mood to see little girls get beaten/defeated/murdered. partly out of spite for the world, partly cause I find the tragedy cathartic/hot
