The spicier meat, with a side of bacon wrapped scallops and ice cold water. This is where I talk and draw about the Freaky (loli shota cub). Sometimes I also talk about general sex topics.
Most posts unlisted except retoots. Follow requests accepted and vetted. No DNI, FUB free. I like to talk so check replies.
I "should" probably be more interested in like how racism and sexism intersects into fandom but honestly I am already dealing with and seeing the antishipper and censorship shit and it feels like it would be too easy for that to interfere. Like let me write my fucky kink stuff before we get into all that
@ebi yeah i gey this. The trick is to start with one thing, and start small. Make a short fanfic and build up. Make a slideshow set to music for your ship before animating. And so on
This kinsey scale is like weird to me for two main reasons. It doesn't take into account any non binary genders, so like would an agender person even fit on this? Or like what if you like women and enbys but not men? Also is this referring only to how attractive people find each other? Cause I feel like there are a lot more aspects to that besides gender identity and/or birth sex. Like there are several people who only find young people attractive, or old people.
The second reason is that the idea of sexuality being fluid is really unclear. What does it mean? I have heard of people identifying as gay for a portion of their life, and then changing that to straight. Does that actually mean they "changed" over time or were they just wrong the first time? That's such an individual thing. I don't think it's something you just decide or force though. I think this maybe needs more research but that probably won't happen anytime soon.
I would be X on the kinsey scale because I'm on the aroace spectrum. I only find fictional characters attractive. But also that probably has a scale too, as I tend to lean more towards fictional males. It's way too limiting I feel.
The Tiki amiibo on ebay are not only brand new in box, but half the price than the boxed one at that game store! What a racket. Well when I get some extra cash I'll get one and have impure thoughts about her.
Man I really need to start back up learning Japanese. It would open up so much to me I feel. I just am worried about memorizing Kanji and words specifically
I think generally the player characters of Pokémon are designed well despite being blanker than a blank slate personality wise. At least it makes it more fun to inject a personality into them.
I'm glad there is so much porn of Leaf (Pokémon) she is a very pretty modest girl and I have always been interested in her despite never finishing FRLG
and then things that bug other people that I find neutral or am confused about the rage towards
- monster designs based on objects - being very specific about which characters in a ship are top/bottom or dom/sub and never having them switch ever - shipping characters going against their "canonical" sexuality - water levels in general - "as you know" - feet and inflation fetish - genderbends - OOC in fanworks. Official media is a different story -comic sans and other fonts when it fits the style
Then things that peeve me off but I can get past or see the point in (not exhaustive)
- having characters that are interesting or development or are just really neat die. This is situational but I am just a sad sack at the end of the day - giving established characters a "hentai protagonist face" when they have an actual face and personality. This usually happens in male/female porn with the male - third act breakups - straight couples in sitcoms who clearly have Issues that make you wonder why they are still married. I have never seen this with any other kind of couple combo, it's JUST straight couples, I could go on a rant about this actually - trans/disability headcanons that are based on a few superficial traits/stereotypes and aren't expanded beyond that. Or rather the peeving thing is when it becomes fandom wide and you get labeled a bigot for thinking differently - "this character is -coded" for several reasons - gijinka of animal characters
- STDs. I genuinely think they are the least attractive thing on the planet - nearly every variation of scat fetish (eating, hyper, torture). I can tolerate it if it directly follows vore and digestion (disposal) - smegma, it's too distracting - cartoons that need to have several noises at every second, it's extremely overstimulating - mouthpieces, especially if the artist didn't make the character
I don't have a lot of pet peeves or hard nos when it comes to art/tropes. Most things I can just get past or they mildly confuse me and I'll find something else I like about a media. Even some of the stuff on my "No" F-list I can tolerate if there's something else I like adjacent to it.
